Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson states the case brightly: The Obama administration has co-opted free-market terms (“choice” and “competition) to sell a government health plan.
“The promise of the public plan is a mirage. Its political brilliance is to use free-market rhetoric (more “choice” and “competition”) to expand government power. But why would a plan tied to Medicare control health spending, when Medicare hasn’t? From 1970 to 2007, Medicare spending per beneficiary rose 9.2 percent annually compared to the 10.4 percent of private insurers — and the small difference partly reflects cost shifting. Congress periodically improves Medicare benefits, and there’s a limit to how much squeezing reimbursement rates can check costs. Doctors and hospitals already complain that low payments limit services or discourage physicians from taking Medicare patients.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502041.html
Filed under: Culture, Economics, Education, Media, Politics, Taxes | Leave a comment »