Rachel Maddow is all incensed that Mississippi has effectively banned abortions by requiring all abortionists to be OB/GYN who have hospital privileges, and, as it happens, no hospital will give such privileges lest no one use their hospital. People have choices.
As Rachel correctly says, the state is not making abortion illegal, it is making abortion unavailable. The law does not deal with availability, it deals with law.
North Dakota and Alabama may soon be following suit with similar laws.
I support abortion rights, and I also support the State of Mississippi. I believe that abortion, which is not addressed in the Constitution, is, under the 10th Amendment, a state issue.
I may disagree with Mississippi, but the Constitution makes abortion a state issue and that’s good enough for me. I don’t live there and I have no vote on the issue. Mississippi doesn’t care what I think.
Come to think about it, Mississippi doesn’t care what Rachel Maddow thinks, either. Rachel thinks that federal judge should step in, but I am at a loss to think what a federal judge might do. Mississippi didn’t make abortion illegal, so what is a judge to do — order a hospital to permit any OB/GYN who applies to be given hospital privileges? Order the single abortion clinic in Mississippi to remain open in spite of a law that does not ban abortion? Can a judge order a restaurant, or a muffler shop to stay open?
Now federal judges have a lot of power, and some have exercised enormous power, but the anger in the nation is already palpable, and the administration surely recognizes that. The anger with the Justice Department, in particular is extremely high.
No one knows how long the fuse is.
Filed under: Crime, Culture, Economics, Education, Healthcare, Justice, Politics, Taxes | Tagged: anger in the nation, current-events, hospital privileges, Politics, rachel maddow | 1 Comment »