BP

 

Oil is virtually everywhere, it is just easier to drill some places than others. The Middle East is an oil pool under sand – particularly easy to drill. Everyone wants the easiest to get, oil, metal, bread, sex, clothing, houses. (You would be shocked at the houses that are seldom shown because the owner makes it difficult to show. Realtors show those most available, most cooperative.)

Almost half the US is federal lands that are off-limits.

As we can see, few corporations have the technical ability to drill in 5,000 feet of water. WWII submarines could only go 400 feet deep. Today’s very costly nuclear submarines can go almost 10 times that deep but still not to 5,000 feet and when they eventually can they are not equipped to do that sort of work…that work is done by robots.

Our government does not have the technical skill to drill for oil, and it is even more technically difficult to solve a massive problem at that depth.

The government depends on BP because it MUST!

Filed Under: Dancing With The Stars

Secretive on Sestak

(Headline) Gibbs: ‘I’d refer you to the memo’

“White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday he could “understand” if reporters thought he was responsible for keeping them in the dark about an administration position offered to Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) — but he had no immediate answers for reporters about details of the deal.

A reporter asked Gibbs why he wouldn’t discuss the offer over many months, even as the administration contended that nothing inappropriate had taken place. “I’d have to ask counsel for a better answer,” Gibbs said.

The press secretary also demurred on whether offers made to Sestak in June and July of 2009 — as mentioned in the memo of explanation offered by White House counsel Robert Bauer — were made by former President Bill Clinton and whether there were multiple approaches to Sestak, as opposed to the single phone call he described. “Whatever’s in the memo is accurate,” Gibbs said, adding that he would “check.”

Gibbs said the advisory post at issue “was an unpaid position and didn’t constitute a lot of what you hear,” but he didn’t say precisely what the position offered was.

Pressed on how a widely discussed scenario — where Sestak serving on the president’s Intelligence Advisory Board could have been possible while Sestak continued to serve in the House, which is forbidden by the board’s rules — Gibbs said simply, “I’d refer you to the memo.”’

http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0610/secretive_on_sestak_435a43c7-f633-414e-adf7-b50533599c78.html

Filed Under: Yes We Can

 “Miguel Sotelo’s journey to legal status in the United States began in a Lancaster jail.

That’s where the undocumented immigrant married his wife, who is in the U.S. legally, in order to start the process of becoming legal himself.

“I don’t want to go back to Mexico,” the San Bernardino man said. “I want to stay here.”

Read more: http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_15192436#ixzz0peIbE3tr

So here is the Question: Should he get his citizenship?

The law says that in view of his 21 years of illegality, he must return to Mexico for 10 years. He wants a waiver on that time.

Now, before you make a decision – consider this:

Miguel has admitted to five DUI felony arrests

Miguel has four US children that he does not support

Miguel is unemployed

Miguel was declared a “menace to society” by the last judge who denied him bail for his last arrest.

So. Does Miguel deserve marriage, and a waiver of 10 year deportation, as his path to citizenship?